RESUMO Introdução: A reabsorção cervical invasiva (RCI) é um tipo relativamente raro de reabsorção radicular externa (RRE), no qual uma reabsorção localizada começa na região cervical do dente, abaixo da junção epitelial e acima da crista marginal. Objetivo: Descrever o caso clínico de um menino com 11 anos de idade, sem histórico de trauma dentário, apresentando apinhamento moderado e erupção ectópica do incisivo central superior. Ele realizava tratamento ortodôntico em outro local, mas sua família estava insatisfeita com os resultados. Descrição: Foi iniciado um novo tratamento, que incluiu a expansão rápida da maxila, seguida pela extração de quatro pré-molares. Durante a avaliação de rotina da radiografia panorâmica, uma imagem radiolúcida foi detectada, e uma radiografia periapical da região foi solicitada, sendo encontrada uma RCI no incisivo central superior direito. O tratamento foi finalizado com cautela e, apesar do uso de forças leves, o incisivo central estava seriamente comprometido pela RCI e, portanto, precisou ser extraído. Conclusão: Esse exemplo clínico discute a importância das radiografias de rotina para o diagnóstico precoce da RCI.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Invasive cervical resorption (ICR) is a relatively rare type of ERR (External Root Resorption), in which a localized resorption begins in the cervical area of the tooth, below the epithelial junction and above the ridge crest. Objective: Describe the clinical case of an 11-year-old boy with no dental trauma history, presenting moderate crowding and ectopic eruption of the maxillary right central incisor. He had been undergoing orthodontic treatment elsewhere, and his family was dissatisfied with the results. Description: A new treatment was indicated, which included rapid maxillary expansion followed by extraction of four premolars. During routine panoramic evaluation, a radiolucid image was detected and a periapical radiograph was requested. At this point, an ICR of the maxillary right central incisor was found. The treatment was cautiously finalized and despite the use of light forces, central incisor was severally compromised by ICR and was therefore extracted. Conclusion: This clinical example discusses the importance of routine radiographs for the early diagnoses of ICR.

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the kerma at the surface of the lens in TMJ CBCT and to derive the equivalent dose. An anthropomorphic phantom of the head and neck manufactured by Radiation Support Devices (model RS-230) was used. The dosimetric measurements were obtained by using fourteen thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) dosimeters (LiF: Mg, Ti), divided in two pairs (one pair for each eye) and positioned on the surface of the phantom, per scanner evaluated. The tomographic images were acquired in three types of CBCT equipment (CS 9000, Gendex GXCB 500 and i-CAT). Values of equivalent dose obtained were: 5.82 mSv (CS 9000); 5.38 mSv (Gendex GXCB 500) and 7.98 mSv (i-CAT), which varied in accordance with the scanner and the exposure factors used in the image acquisition. The Gendex GXCB 500 used larger FOV and higher kV, resulting in levels close to those obtained on the CS 9000, while larger doses were associated with the i-CAT. The dose values associated with TMJ radiological procedures should be performed with awareness and appropriateness due to sensitivity of the lens.

Introdução: Para realização de mensurações precisas para implantes osteointegrados, é necessário que as imagens tomográficas apresentem uma qualidade mínima, que permita a visualização clara das estruturas anatômicas.Objetivo:Diante disso, avaliou-se, subjetivamente, a aceitabilidade das imagens de diferentes protocolos de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC), para o planejamento de implantes osteointegrados.Material e método: Foram obtidas imagens de TCFC de dez hemimandíbulas maceradas no equipamento K9000 3D, sendo modificada apenas a miliamperagem (Grupo I: 2 mA; Grupo II: 8 mA e Grupo III: 15 mA). As aquisições foram feitas com 80 kV, FOV de 5 × 3,7 cm, matriz de 512 × 512 e voxel de 0,076 mm de espessura. Após as aquisições, três avaliadores analisaram as reconstruções ortogonais em três tamanhos de voxel, constituindo-se, assim, nove grupos experimentais. Após a realização das mensurações de altura e espessura óssea, os avaliadores atribuíram escores (sim ou não) para a aceitabilidade das imagens para mensurações.Resultado: Os grupos apresentaram qualidade de imagem aceitável para o planejamento de implantes, com exceção das imagens adquiridas com 2 mA e analisadas com voxel de 0,076 mm e 0,535 mm.Conclusão: O protocolo de 8 mA e voxel de 2,1 mm deve ser, preferencialmente, indicado na identificação do canal mandibular, já que a dose de radiação é menor do que nos protocolos de 15 mA e a qualidade de imagem é superior aos protocolos de 2 mA; além disso, voxel de 2,1 mm apresentou maior aceitabilidade das imagens.

Introduction: Performing accurate measurements for osseointegrated implant requires that the tomographic images show a minimum quality to allow adequate visualization of anatomical structures.Objective: Therefore, the acceptability of images of different Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) protocols was assessed subjectively for the planning of osseointegrated implantsMaterial and method: CBCT images of ten hemimandibles macerated in K9000 3D system were obtained, and only mA was modified (Group I: 2mA, Group II: 8mA and Group III: 15mA). All acquisitions were made with 80kV, FOV of 5 × 3.7 cm, matrix: 512 × 512 and voxel thickness of 0.076 mm. After the acquisitions, the orthogonal reconstructions were analyzed in three voxel sizes by three evaluators, thus making up nine experimental groups . Following bone height and thickness measurements, the evaluators scored (as yes or no) the acceptability of the images to be measured.Result:The groups presented acceptable image quality for implant planning, with the exception of the images acquired with 2mA and analyzed with voxel of 0.076 mm and 0.535 mm.Conclusion:The 8mA and 2.1 mm voxel protocol should preferably be indicated in the identification of the mandibular canal, as the radiation dose is lower than 15mA protocols and image quality is higher than 2 mA protocols. Additionally, 2.1 mm voxel showed a higher acceptability of images.

This study was conducted to investigate how well cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can detect simulated cavitary defects in condyles, and to test the influence of the reconstruction protocols. Defects were created with spherical diamond burs (numbers 1013, 1016, 3017) in superior and/or posterior surfaces of twenty condyles. The condyles were scanned, and cross-sectional reconstructions were performed with nine different protocols, based on slice thickness (0.2, 0.6, 1.0 mm) and on the filters (original image, Sharpen Mild, S9) used. Two observers evaluated the defects, determining their presence and location. Statistical analysis was carried out using simple Kappa coefficient and McNemar's test to check inter- and intra-rater reliability. The chi-square test was used to compare the rater accuracy. Analysis of variance (Tukey's test) assessed the effect of the protocols used. Kappa values for inter- and intra-rater reliability demonstrate almost perfect agreement. The proportion of correct answers was significantly higher than that of errors for cavitary defects on both condyle surfaces (p < 0.01). Only in identifying the defects located on the posterior surface was it possible to observe the influence of the 1.0 mm protocol thickness and no filter, which showed a significantly lower value. Based on the results of the current study, the technique used was valid for identifying the existence of cavities in the condyle surface. However, the protocol of a 1.0 mm-thick slice and no filter proved to be the worst method for identifying the defects on the posterior surface.